ProShares, the tenth largest provider of ETFs according to CNBC, has two proposals in the running, both based upon bitcoin futures contracts approved by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission in 2017.
What's more, this impending decision comes at the heels of a more recent ruling by the SEC to delay their determination on a physical-backed bitcoin ETF put forth by VanEck and SolidX. The distinction between the two, a physical and futures-backed ETF, is worth unpacking to understand the ProShares proposal - aside from whether bitcoin ETFs should or shouldn't be approved in the U.S. - centers on which among the two actually has a better shot at SEC approval.
With a physical-backed bitcoin ETF, investors can effectively participate in the crypto market without being in direct possession of any coins, thereby avoiding some of the risks associated with handling bitcoin private keys.
Futures-backed bitcoin ETFs take this level of separation one step further by basing the shares in the fund on bitcoin futures contracts as opposed to actual bitcoins themselves.
Holding futures contracts with set prices and expiration dates hold lower degrees of risk given that the company issuing bitcoin ETFs wouldn't have to make efforts to safeguard any bitcoin assets from theft or hack.
As a result then, it doesn't come as much of a surprise that among the 10 bitcoin-related funds that are concurrently undergoing review by SEC officials in the next two months, only one is a physical-backed bitcoin ETF, suggesting most companies are placing their bets on approval of a futures-backed trading option as opposed to physical.
"Until such time major institutions put their name to cryptocurrency custody, I don't believe a physical ETF can exist in the U.S...I think any futures backed ETF in the United States now has a far better chance of being approved."
From a strictly operational standpoint, Eric Balchunas, senior ETF analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, points out that it is widely understood "Where the investors have a choice of buying the ETF that hold the futures versus the ones that physically holds it...95% of the people go to the physical one, the only time they hold the one that holds futures are if they have to."
By holding bitcoin ETF futures contracts, the fund will often have to maintain a "Rolling position," buying contracts at high early prices and later selling these contracts closer to expiry at comparatively low prices.
Still, one thing is for certain: the market impact of a bitcoin ETF - if and when approved by the SEC - will be a significant one.
The SEC Is Weighing a Bitcoin Futures ETF
Udgivet den Aug 20, 2018
by Coindesk | Udgivet den Coinage
Coinage
Nævnt i denne artikel
Seneste nyheder
Se alt
First Mover: What's Next for Bitcoin as Wall Street Gets Vaccine Booster
Bitcoin was higher for a second day, staying in a range of between roughly $15,200 and $15,600, as news of progress in developing a coronavirus vaccine appeared to touch off a rally in U.S. stocks.
Market Wrap: Bitcoin Fails to Break $15.9K; Over 50K ETH Staked on Eth 2.0 Contract
Bitcoin gained Wednesday while Ethereum 2.0 staking has been ramping up.
Citibank Analyst Says Bitcoin Could Pass $300K by December 2021
A senior analyst at U.S.-based financial giant Citibank has penned a report drawing on similarities between the 1970s gold market and bitcoin.
Blockchain Bites: Data Unions. Hard Forks. And One Citi Analyst's Case for $300K BTC.
A Citibank managing director thinks bitcoin could hit $318,000.